Zipnosis Team
Excerpted from remarks by Dr. Hafner-Fogarty at the C-Tel conference, December 1, 2017

Virtual care holds enormous potential to transform the healthcare landscape. Since you are here, you most likely agree that virtual care (and telemedicine) can be of great benefit for patients, providers, and health systems. In today’s digitally focused landscape, virtual care is truly on the cusp of having a dramatic, positive impact. But – and of course there’s always a but – there’s a big obstacle standing in the way: provider adoption, fueled by inconsistent virtual care reimbursement .

I’ve noticed huge disparity in statistics associated with provider adoption of “telemedicine”. For example, a KPMG survey earlier this year found that about 30% of clinician respondents were using some form of telemedicine. However, a 2016 AAFP survey showed only 15% of respondents had used telemedicine tools in the previous 12 months. Maybe most telling is that the KPMG survey listed provider reluctance as a top barrier to health systems implementing a telemedicine solution. Read more.

Tags: clinical industry

Related Insights.

Regulatory Roundup—September 2021

Regulatory Roundup—September 2021

Welcome back to another month of Zipnosis Regulatory Roundup! There’s been considerable movement in the regulatory landscape in the last month, especially in the federal space. Let’s dive in to see what’s been happening!Federal On September 3rd, The Biden-Harris...

read more
Regulatory Roundup—August 2021

Regulatory Roundup—August 2021

Welcome back to another edition of Zipnosis Regulatory Roundup. For this month, I wanted to give some context information before diving into regulations—more specifically, the basic steps a bill takes as it moves through Congress. As you will see in our recap this...

read more