The Virtual Care Insider

The Virtual Care Reimbursement Conundrum

in Zipnosis In the News

Zipnosis Team

Zipnosis Team
February 21, 2018

Excerpted from remarks by Dr. Hafner-Fogarty at the C-Tel conference, December 1, 2017

Virtual care holds enormous potential to transform the healthcare landscape. Since you are here, you most likely agree that virtual care (and telemedicine) can be of great benefit for patients, providers, and health systems. In today’s digitally focused landscape, virtual care is truly on the cusp of having a dramatic, positive impact. But – and of course there’s always a but – there’s a big obstacle standing in the way: provider adoption, fueled by inconsistent virtual care reimbursement .

I’ve noticed huge disparity in statistics associated with provider adoption of “telemedicine”. For example, a KPMG survey earlier this year found that about 30% of clinician respondents were using some form of telemedicine. However, a 2016 AAFP survey showed only 15% of respondents had used telemedicine tools in the previous 12 months. Maybe most telling is that the KPMG survey listed provider reluctance as a top barrier to health systems implementing a telemedicine solution. Read more.

What’s New at Zipnosis?

Know Thyself

Know Thyself

Jon Pearce, July 15, 2019
Great UX Vlog

Great UX — Wrong User.

Jon Pearce, July 9, 2019
Pets and Gadgets

Pets & Gadgets—Woof

Jon Pearce, June 26, 2019
customer summit 2018
Matt Hodes in meeting explaining something to coworker.

ZipPlus...Plus Some Added Thoughts

Matt Hodes, June 12, 2019
scott-bader-product