The Virtual Care Insider

The Virtual Care Reimbursement Conundrum

in Zipnosis In the News

Zipnosis Team

Zipnosis Team
February 21, 2018

Excerpted from remarks by Dr. Hafner-Fogarty at the C-Tel conference, December 1, 2017

Virtual care holds enormous potential to transform the healthcare landscape. Since you are here, you most likely agree that virtual care (and telemedicine) can be of great benefit for patients, providers, and health systems. In today’s digitally focused landscape, virtual care is truly on the cusp of having a dramatic, positive impact. But – and of course there’s always a but – there’s a big obstacle standing in the way: provider adoption, fueled by inconsistent virtual care reimbursement .

I’ve noticed huge disparity in statistics associated with provider adoption of “telemedicine”. For example, a KPMG survey earlier this year found that about 30% of clinician respondents were using some form of telemedicine. However, a 2016 AAFP survey showed only 15% of respondents had used telemedicine tools in the previous 12 months. Maybe most telling is that the KPMG survey listed provider reluctance as a top barrier to health systems implementing a telemedicine solution. Read more.

What’s New at Zipnosis?

California Virtual Care

The Golden State Does it Again

Uzi Marte, October 29, 2019
BRAVE Award to MUSC

Helping communities when they need it most

Jon Pearce, October 22, 2019
Let's Talk About Clinical Quality

Let's Talk About Clinical Quality

Jon Pearce, October 15, 2019
SSM Featured
CS19-Panel

September is one of my favorite months of the year

Catherine Murphy, September 24, 2019
Telemedicine vs Virtual Care

Telemedicine vs Virtual Care

Jon Pearce, September 17, 2019