Zipnosis Team
Zipnosis Team

It’s no secret, at this point, that telehealth rates exploded in response to the COVID-19 crisis. But a KLAS report published this week found that, while some telehealth technology vendors rose to the occasion, others have struggled to deliver.

“No one could have predicted COVID-19, so it is no surprise that all vendors initially struggled to manage the rapid increase in telehealth adoption,” said KLAS researchers.

“Most vendors were able to eventually right the ship, and while the situation was unique, vendors’ responses provide insight into their ability to react to factors outside of their control and continue to help customers be successful moving forward,” they added.

WHY IT MATTERS

The KLAS report was organized into three main facets of the telehealth tech landscape: virtual care platforms, video conferencing platforms and electronic health record-centric virtual care platforms.

Of the virtual care platforms, KLAS found that customer satisfaction with Amwell has steadily declined since 2018. However, the report also notes that Amwell Now, released in response to COVID-19, has received positive early feedback.

Meanwhile, Teladoc Health’s InTouch Health solution has recovered from the strained support and out-of-stock hardware that hampered early COVID-19 response. But the separate Teladoc Health Licensed Platform, which is separate from its acquired InTouch solution, has “struggled to scale” to the significantly increased patient volumes.

“Some Teladoc customers want a more integrated experience and question Teladoc’s ability to deliver through multiple acquisitions and mergers,” said researchers.

Most of the focused solutions, such as Caregility, Mend, VSee, swyMed and Zipnosis, have high reported customer satisfaction. MDLive, however, faced long wait times and a lack of integration for both provider and payer organizations.

As far as video conferencing platforms went, customers reported that Doxy.me’s low cost was appealing, but that its onboarding, guidance, support and executive involvement “fall short of their expectations.” Zoom customers praised the tool’s stability and scalability, but said patient experience can be frustrating and see the platform as “transactional.”

“Almost 30% of Zoom’s and Doxy.me’s healthcare customers say the solutions will not be kept long term. Hoping for better integration and a simplified clinician experience, many plan to switch to their EMR vendor’s offering once it is sufficiently mature,” wrote report authors.

Microsoft Teams has scaled well, say customers, although the patient experience lags behind other solutions. And as for Vidyo, the reports aren’t spectacular: Clients are “the most frustrated in this report.”

Tags: Our Difference

Related Insights.

Looking ahead—2021 virtual care predictions

Looking ahead—2021 virtual care predictions

It goes without saying—2020 was a year of incredible virtual care acceleration. The industry was propelled to the forefront of healthcare, with health systems seeing massive patient volumes, implementing virtual care across new service lines, and disrupting the status...

read more
2020 in the rearview mirror

2020 in the rearview mirror

This year has been unlike any other. The outbreak of the novel coronavirus forced the healthcare industry into fast innovation and agility that hadn’t ever been seen before—but was desperately needed. This disruption compelled us, and our partners, to rise to the...

read more
The unsung heroes of 2020: our pets

The unsung heroes of 2020: our pets

There’s no denying that the presence of pets in our lives has been one of the silver-linings of the pandemic. The Zip team quickly learned that our new work-from-home situation would become good (or not so good…) news for our special creatures. And, we have to admit,...

read more